Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder crossing and objects" » "coder border crossing and objects" (Expand search), "coder border crossings and objects" (Expand search), "coder borders crossing and objects" (Expand search), "coder coder crossing in objects" (Expand search), "coder coder crossing rate objects" (Expand search), "coder coder crossing the objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder crossing and objects" (Expand search), "code code crossing and objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec crossing and objects" (Expand search), "coder coder crossing and object" (Expand search), "coder coder crossing and subjects" (Expand search), "coder coder crossing and objectives" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder crossing and objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder crossing and objects\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder crossing and objects ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder crossing and objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.