Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder creating shock problems" » "coder co creating shock problems" (Expand search), "coder code creation shock problems" (Expand search), "coder after creating shock problems" (Expand search), "coder coder spreading shock problems" (Expand search), "coder coder creating space problems" (Expand search), "coder coder creating mooc problems" (Expand search), "coder coder creating stock problems" (Expand search), "coder coder creating stock problem" (Expand search), "coder coder creating shop problems" (Expand search), "coder decoder creating shock problems" (Expand search), "code code creating shock problems" (Expand search), "decoder codec creating shock problems" (Expand search)
"in python pythons python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pythons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder creating shock problems") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder creating shock problems\") OR (\"in python pythons python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder creating shock problems ) OR ( in python pythons python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder creating shock problems") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))*.