Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder creating discursive process" » "coder coder reading discursive process" (Expand search), "coder coder writing discursive process" (Expand search), "coder coder reasoning discursive process" (Expand search), "coder coder creating discursive practices" (Expand search), "coder co creating discursive process" (Expand search), "coder code creation discursive process" (Expand search), "coder after creating discursive process" (Expand search), "coder decoder creating discursive process" (Expand search), "code code creating discursive process" (Expand search), "decoder codec creating discursive process" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder creating discursive process") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder creating discursive process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder creating discursive process ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder creating discursive process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.