Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder covering location functions" » "coder coder covering locomotion functions" (Expand search), "coder coder covering allocation function" (Expand search), "coder coder covering locution functional" (Expand search), "coder women covering location functions" (Expand search), "coder after covering location functions" (Expand search), "coder polymer covering location functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder covering location functions" (Expand search), "code code covering location functions" (Expand search), "decoder codec covering location functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder covering location functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder covering location functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder covering location functions ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder covering location functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.