Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coverage using prony" » "coder code coverage using prony" (Expand search), "coder cancer coverage using prony" (Expand search), "coder center coverage using prony" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage in prony" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage among prony" (Expand search), "coder coder cover using prony" (Expand search), "coder decoder coverage using prony" (Expand search), "code code coverage using prony" (Expand search), "decoder codec coverage using prony" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage using proxy" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage using prins" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage using proc" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coverage using prony") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coverage using prony\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coverage using prony ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coverage using prony") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.