Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coverage predicting function" » "coder coder coverage predictions function" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage prediction function" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage writing function" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage predicting functions" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage mediating function" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "coder cancer coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "coder center coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "coder decoder coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "code code coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "decoder codec coverage predicting function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coverage predicting function") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coverage predicting function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coverage predicting function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.