Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coverage predicted function" » "coder coder average predicted function" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage prediction function" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage produced function" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage predicted functions" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage predicted functional" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage predicting function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "coder cancer coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "coder center coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "coder decoder coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "code code coverage predicted function" (Expand search), "decoder codec coverage predicted function" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coverage predicted function") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coverage predicted function\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coverage predicted function ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coverage predicted function") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.