Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coverage has implications" » "coder coder coverage dams implications" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage males implications" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage aids implications" (Expand search), "coder code coverage has implications" (Expand search), "coder cancer coverage has implications" (Expand search), "coder center coverage has implications" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage maps implications" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage bias implications" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage bags implications" (Expand search), "coder decoder coverage has implications" (Expand search), "code code coverage has implications" (Expand search), "decoder codec coverage has implications" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coverage has implications") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coverage has implications\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coverage has implications ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coverage has implications") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.