Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coverage estimation function" » "coder coder coverage estimating functions" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage activation function" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage excitation function" (Expand search), "coder code coverage estimation function" (Expand search), "coder cancer coverage estimation function" (Expand search), "coder center coverage estimation function" (Expand search), "coder decoder coverage estimation function" (Expand search), "code code coverage estimation function" (Expand search), "decoder codec coverage estimation function" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coverage estimation function") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coverage estimation function\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coverage estimation function ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coverage estimation function") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.