Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coverage effect object" » "coder coder coverage affects object" (Expand search), "coder coder leverage effect object" (Expand search), "coder coder average effect object" (Expand search), "coder code coverage effect object" (Expand search), "coder cancer coverage effect object" (Expand search), "coder center coverage effect object" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage effect subject" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage perfect objects" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage direct object" (Expand search), "coder decoder coverage effect object" (Expand search), "code code coverage effect object" (Expand search), "decoder codec coverage effect object" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coverage effect object") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coverage effect object\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coverage effect object ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coverage effect object") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.