Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coupling at objects" » "coder mode coupling at objects" (Expand search), "coder model coupling at objects" (Expand search), "coder core coupling at objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder coupling at objects" (Expand search), "code code coupling at objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec coupling at objects" (Expand search), "coder coder couplings at objects" (Expand search), "coder coder coupling and objects" (Expand search), "coder coder coupling in objects" (Expand search), "coder coder coupling art objects" (Expand search), "coder coder coupling lat objects" (Expand search), "coder coder coupling t objects" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coupling at objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coupling at objects\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coupling at objects ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coupling at objects") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.