Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coupled linear programming" » "coder coder coupled line programming" (Expand search), "coder coder coupled nonlinear programming" (Expand search), "coder coder coupled inas programming" (Expand search), "coder model coupled linear programming" (Expand search), "coder mode coupled linear programming" (Expand search), "coder order coupled linear programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder coupled linear programming" (Expand search), "code code coupled linear programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec coupled linear programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coupled linear programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coupled linear programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coupled linear programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coupled linear programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.