Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder control perceptions process" » "coder coder control perception process" (Expand search), "coder coder context perceptions process" (Expand search), "coder coder content perceptions process" (Expand search), "coder coder control perceptions producers" (Expand search), "coder coder control perception press" (Expand search), "coder coder control interception process" (Expand search), "coder poder control perceptions process" (Expand search), "coder encoder control perceptions process" (Expand search), "coder poder controle perceptions process" (Expand search), "coder decoder control perceptions process" (Expand search), "code code control perceptions process" (Expand search), "decoder codec control perceptions process" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder control perceptions process") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder control perceptions process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder control perceptions process ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder control perceptions process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.