Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder consumer attention process" » "coder coder consumer intention process" (Expand search), "coder coder consumer retention process" (Expand search), "coder coder consumers intention process" (Expand search), "coder coder consumer attention processes" (Expand search), "coder coder consumer attention problems" (Expand search), "coder coder consumer attentional processes" (Expand search), "coder code consumer attention process" (Expand search), "coder modern consumer attention process" (Expand search), "coder older consumer attention process" (Expand search), "coder decoder consumer attention process" (Expand search), "code code consumer attention process" (Expand search), "decoder codec consumer attention process" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder consumer attention process") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder consumer attention process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder consumer attention process ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder consumer attention process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.