Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder considering logical programming" » "coder coder considering local programming" (Expand search), "coder coder considering biological programming" (Expand search), "coder coder considering typical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder considering logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder considering physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder considering goal programming" (Expand search), "coder code considering logical programming" (Expand search), "coder model considering logical programming" (Expand search), "coder models considering logical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder considering logical programming" (Expand search), "code code considering logical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec considering logical programming" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder considering logical programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder considering logical programming\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder considering logical programming ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder considering logical programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.