Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder considering its restricted" » "coder code considering its restricted" (Expand search), "coder model considering its restricted" (Expand search), "coder models considering its restricted" (Expand search), "coder coder considering _ restricted" (Expand search), "coder coder considering an restricted" (Expand search), "coder coder considering is restricted" (Expand search), "coder coder considering with restricted" (Expand search), "coder coder considering in restricted" (Expand search), "coder decoder considering its restricted" (Expand search), "code code considering its restricted" (Expand search), "decoder codec considering its restricted" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder considering its restricted") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder considering its restricted\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder considering its restricted ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder considering its restricted") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.