Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder considering block programming" » "coder code considering block programming" (Expand search), "coder model considering block programming" (Expand search), "coder models considering block programming" (Expand search), "coder coder considering blood programming" (Expand search), "coder coder considering both programming" (Expand search), "coder coder considering local programming" (Expand search), "coder coder considering goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder considering cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder considering c programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder considering block programming" (Expand search), "code code considering block programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec considering block programming" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder considering block programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder considering block programming\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder considering block programming ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder considering block programming") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.