Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder computing sequential processes" » "coder coder compelling sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder composite sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder communicating sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder coder computing sequential process" (Expand search), "coder coder computing sequential processing" (Expand search), "coder coder computing referential processes" (Expand search), "coder modern computing sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder model computing sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder power computing sequential processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder computing sequential processes" (Expand search), "code code computing sequential processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec computing sequential processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder computing sequential processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder computing sequential processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder computing sequential processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder computing sequential processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.