Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder computing processing proposal" » "coder coder coating processing proposal" (Expand search), "coder coder collating processing proposal" (Expand search), "coder coder complaint processing proposal" (Expand search), "coder coder computing process proposal" (Expand search), "coder coder computing processes proposal" (Expand search), "coder coder computing processing protocol" (Expand search), "coder modern computing processing proposal" (Expand search), "coder model computing processing proposal" (Expand search), "coder power computing processing proposal" (Expand search), "coder decoder computing processing proposal" (Expand search), "code code computing processing proposal" (Expand search), "decoder codec computing processing proposal" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder computing processing proposal") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder computing processing proposal\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder computing processing proposal ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder computing processing proposal") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.