Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder computing optical processor" » "coder coder computing optimal processor" (Expand search), "coder coder counting optical processor" (Expand search), "coder coder computing aplicado processor" (Expand search), "coder coder computing optical processes" (Expand search), "coder coder computing optical processing" (Expand search), "coder coder computing optimal process" (Expand search), "coder modern computing optical processor" (Expand search), "coder model computing optical processor" (Expand search), "coder power computing optical processor" (Expand search), "coder decoder computing optical processor" (Expand search), "code code computing optical processor" (Expand search), "decoder codec computing optical processor" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder computing optical processor") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder computing optical processor\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder computing optical processor ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder computing optical processor") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.