Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder computing discourse processes" » "coder coder competing discourses processes" (Expand search), "coder coder comparing discourse processes" (Expand search), "coder coder competent discourse processes" (Expand search), "coder coder computing discourse process" (Expand search), "coder coder computing discourse processing" (Expand search), "coder coder computing discursive processes" (Expand search), "coder modern computing discourse processes" (Expand search), "coder model computing discourse processes" (Expand search), "coder power computing discourse processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder computing discourse processes" (Expand search), "code code computing discourse processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec computing discourse processes" (Expand search)
"in python pythin python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder computing discourse processes") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder computing discourse processes\") OR (\"in python pythin python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder computing discourse processes ) OR ( in python pythin python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder computing discourse processes") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))*.