Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder computer discourse processes" » "coder coder computer discourse process" (Expand search), "coder coder computer discourse processing" (Expand search), "coder coder computer discursive processes" (Expand search), "coder coder competent discourse processes" (Expand search), "coder coder counter discourse processes" (Expand search), "coder coder computer course processes" (Expand search), "coder model computer discourse processes" (Expand search), "coder node computer discourse processes" (Expand search), "coder color computer discourse processes" (Expand search), "coder decoder computer discourse processes" (Expand search), "code code computer discourse processes" (Expand search), "decoder codec computer discourse processes" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder computer discourse processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder computer discourse processes\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder computer discourse processes ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder computer discourse processes") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.