Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder computer decomposition problem" » "coder coder computer composition problem" (Expand search), "coder coder competence decomposition problem" (Expand search), "coder coder matter decomposition problem" (Expand search), "coder coder computer decomposition process" (Expand search), "coder coder computer decomposition product" (Expand search), "coder coder computer decomposition processes" (Expand search), "coder model computer decomposition problem" (Expand search), "coder node computer decomposition problem" (Expand search), "coder color computer decomposition problem" (Expand search), "coder decoder computer decomposition problem" (Expand search), "code code computer decomposition problem" (Expand search), "decoder codec computer decomposition problem" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder computer decomposition problem") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder computer decomposition problem\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder computer decomposition problem ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder computer decomposition problem") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.