Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder computational evasion process" » "coder coder computational vision process" (Expand search), "coder coder computational decision process" (Expand search), "coder coder computational emulsion process" (Expand search), "coder code computational evasion process" (Expand search), "coder poder computacional evasion process" (Expand search), "coder model computational evasion process" (Expand search), "coder coder computational invasion process" (Expand search), "coder coder computational revision process" (Expand search), "coder coder computational erosion process" (Expand search), "coder decoder computational evasion process" (Expand search), "code code computational evasion process" (Expand search), "decoder codec computational evasion process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder computational evasion process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder computational evasion process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder computational evasion process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder computational evasion process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.