Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder computation planning problem" » "coder coder computational planning problem" (Expand search), "coder coder computation learning problem" (Expand search), "coder coder communication planning problem" (Expand search), "coder modern computation planning problem" (Expand search), "coder core computation planning problem" (Expand search), "coder color computation planning problem" (Expand search), "coder coder computation packing problem" (Expand search), "coder coder computation planning process" (Expand search), "coder decoder computation planning problem" (Expand search), "code code computation planning problem" (Expand search), "decoder codec computation planning problem" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder computation planning problem") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder computation planning problem\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder computation planning problem ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder computation planning problem") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.