Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder composition estimation pattern" » "coder coder composition estimative pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder position estimation pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder composition evaluation pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder composition restoration pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder composition activation pattern" (Expand search), "coder coder composition exhumation pattern" (Expand search), "coder code composition estimation pattern" (Expand search), "coder model composition estimation pattern" (Expand search), "coder color composition estimation pattern" (Expand search), "coder decoder composition estimation pattern" (Expand search), "code code composition estimation pattern" (Expand search), "decoder codec composition estimation pattern" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder composition estimation pattern") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder composition estimation pattern\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder composition estimation pattern ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder composition estimation pattern") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.