Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder components identifies risk" » "coder coder components identified risk" (Expand search), "coder coder components identify risk" (Expand search), "coder coder compounds identified risk" (Expand search), "coder cover components identifies risk" (Expand search), "coder model components identifies risk" (Expand search), "coder power components identifies risk" (Expand search), "coder coder components identifying risk" (Expand search), "coder coder components identifies cross" (Expand search), "coder decoder components identifies risk" (Expand search), "code code components identifies risk" (Expand search), "decoder codec components identifies risk" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder components identifies risk") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder components identifies risk\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder components identifies risk ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder components identifies risk") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.