Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder components affective process" » "coder coder component affective process" (Expand search), "coder coder components affecting process" (Expand search), "coder coder components affect process" (Expand search), "coder coder components affective processes" (Expand search), "coder coder components affective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder components reflective process" (Expand search), "coder cover components affective process" (Expand search), "coder model components affective process" (Expand search), "coder power components affective process" (Expand search), "coder decoder components affective process" (Expand search), "code code components affective process" (Expand search), "decoder codec components affective process" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder components affective process") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder components affective process\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder components affective process ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder components affective process") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.