Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder complexity cognition scope" » "coder coder complexity control scope" (Expand search), "coder coder complexity vegetation scope" (Expand search), "coder coder complexity reduction scope" (Expand search), "coder code complexity cognition scope" (Expand search), "coder model complexity cognition scope" (Expand search), "coder lower complexity cognition scope" (Expand search), "coder coder complexity cognition scale" (Expand search), "coder coder complexity cognition soft" (Expand search), "coder coder complexity cognition case" (Expand search), "coder decoder complexity cognition scope" (Expand search), "code code complexity cognition scope" (Expand search), "decoder codec complexity cognition scope" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder complexity cognition scope") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder complexity cognition scope\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder complexity cognition scope ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder complexity cognition scope") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.