Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder complexity at objects" » "coder code complexity at objects" (Expand search), "coder model complexity at objects" (Expand search), "coder lower complexity at objects" (Expand search), "coder coder complexity an objects" (Expand search), "coder coder complexity and objects" (Expand search), "coder coder complexity in objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder complexity at objects" (Expand search), "code code complexity at objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec complexity at objects" (Expand search), "coder coder complexity art objects" (Expand search), "coder coder complexity lat objects" (Expand search), "coder coder complexity t objects" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder complexity at objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder complexity at objects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder complexity at objects ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder complexity at objects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.