Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder complex instruction proposed" » "coder coder complex innovation proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder complex instruction phase" (Expand search), "coder coder complex construction proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder complex constructions proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder computer instruction proposed" (Expand search), "coder copper complex instruction proposed" (Expand search), "coder holder complex instruction proposed" (Expand search), "coder modern complex instruction proposed" (Expand search), "coder decoder complex instruction proposed" (Expand search), "code code complex instruction proposed" (Expand search), "decoder codec complex instruction proposed" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder complex instruction proposed") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder complex instruction proposed\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder complex instruction proposed ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder complex instruction proposed") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.