Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder competences procedural programming" » "coder coder competencia procedural programming" (Expand search), "coder coder competencia processual programming" (Expand search), "coder coder competences professional programming" (Expand search), "coder coder competences potential programming" (Expand search), "coder core competences procedural programming" (Expand search), "coder over competences procedural programming" (Expand search), "coder gender competences procedural programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder competences procedural programming" (Expand search), "code code competences procedural programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec competences procedural programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder competences procedural programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder competences procedural programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder competences procedural programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder competences procedural programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.