Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coking process effect" » "coder coder cooking process effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coping process effect" (Expand search), "coder coder working process effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coking process effects" (Expand search), "coder coder coking processing effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coking processes effects" (Expand search), "coder power coking process effect" (Expand search), "coder code cloning process effect" (Expand search), "coder codes going process effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coking process effect" (Expand search), "code code coking process effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec coking process effect" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coking process effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coking process effect\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coking process effect ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coking process effect") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.