Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding weine type" » "coder modern coding weine type" (Expand search), "coder color coding weine type" (Expand search), "coder odor coding weine type" (Expand search), "coder coder coding gene type" (Expand search), "coder coder coding canine type" (Expand search), "coder coder coding genes type" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding weine type" (Expand search), "code code coding weine type" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding weine type" (Expand search), "coder coder coding wine type" (Expand search), "coder coder coding kexine type" (Expand search), "coder coder coding line type" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding weine type") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding weine type\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding weine type ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.