Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding waste effect" » "coder modern coding waste effect" (Expand search), "coder color coding waste effect" (Expand search), "coder odor coding waste effect" (Expand search), "coder coder adding waste effect" (Expand search), "coder coder clothing waste effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding system effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding rate effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding acute effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding age effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding waste effect" (Expand search), "code code coding waste effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding waste effect" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding waste effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding waste effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding waste effect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.