Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding was effective" » "coder coder coding waste effective" (Expand search), "coder coder coding mass effective" (Expand search), "coder coder coding is effective" (Expand search), "coder modern coding was effective" (Expand search), "coder color coding was effective" (Expand search), "coder odor coding was effective" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding was effective" (Expand search), "code code coding was effective" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding was effective" (Expand search), "coder coder coding rnas effective" (Expand search), "coder coder coding an effective" (Expand search), "coder coder coding at effective" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding was effective\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding was effective ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding was effective") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.