Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding tv programme" » "coder modern coding tv programme" (Expand search), "coder color coding tv programme" (Expand search), "coder odor coding tv programme" (Expand search), "coder coder coding tv programmes" (Expand search), "coder coder coding hcv programme" (Expand search), "coder coder coding _ programme" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding tv programme" (Expand search), "code code coding tv programme" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding tv programme" (Expand search), "coder coder coding to programme" (Expand search), "coder coder coding ts programme" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the programme" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding tv programme\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding tv programme ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding tv programme") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.