Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python pythons python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pythons python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding ts object" » "coder modern coding ts object" (Expand search), "coder color coding ts object" (Expand search), "coder odor coding ts object" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding ts object" (Expand search), "code code coding ts object" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding ts object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding to object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding is object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding its1 object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding its object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding s object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding vs object" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding ts object") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding ts object\") OR (\"in python pythons python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding ts object ) OR ( in python pythons python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding ts object") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))*.