Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding time decay" » "coder modern coding time decay" (Expand search), "coder color coding time decay" (Expand search), "coder odor coding time decay" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding time decay" (Expand search), "code code coding time decay" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding time decay" (Expand search), "coder coder holding time decay" (Expand search), "coder coder loading time decay" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the decay" (Expand search), "coder coder coding time delay" (Expand search), "coder coder coding time delays" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding time decay\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding time decay ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding time decay") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.