Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding the loss" » "coder modern coding the loss" (Expand search), "coder color coding the loss" (Expand search), "coder odor coding the loss" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding the loss" (Expand search), "code code coding the loss" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding the loss" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding the loss" (Expand search), "coder coder encoding the loss" (Expand search), "coder coder aiding the loss" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the long" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the low" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the loop" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding the loss\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding the loss ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding the loss") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.