Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding the frog" » "coder modern coding the frog" (Expand search), "coder color coding the frog" (Expand search), "coder odor coding the frog" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding the frog" (Expand search), "code code coding the frog" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding the frog" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding the frog" (Expand search), "coder coder encoding the frog" (Expand search), "coder coder aiding the frog" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the front" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the free" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding the frog\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding the frog ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding the frog") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.