Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding the decays" » "coder modern coding the decays" (Expand search), "coder color coding the decays" (Expand search), "coder odor coding the decays" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding the decays" (Expand search), "code code coding the decays" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding the decays" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding the decays" (Expand search), "coder coder encoding the decays" (Expand search), "coder coder aiding the decays" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the decay" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the decades" (Expand search), "coder coder coding that decays" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding the decays") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding the decays\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding the decays ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding the decays") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.