Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding test effect" » "coder modern coding test effect" (Expand search), "coder color coding test effect" (Expand search), "coder odor coding test effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding test effect" (Expand search), "code code coding test effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding test effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding tests effect" (Expand search), "coder coder loading test effect" (Expand search), "coder coder holding test effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding cost effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding list effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding rust effect" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding test effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding test effect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding test effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.