Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding sentence embedding" » "coder coder coding sentence embeddings" (Expand search), "coder coder coding sequence embedding" (Expand search), "coder coder coding sequences embedding" (Expand search), "coder coder during sentence embedding" (Expand search), "coder modern coding sentence embedding" (Expand search), "coder color coding sentence embedding" (Expand search), "coder odor coding sentence embedding" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding sentence embedding" (Expand search), "code code coding sentence embedding" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding sentence embedding" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding sentence embedding\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding sentence embedding ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding sentence embedding") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.