Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding risks proposed" » "coder coder coding tasks proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder coding rights proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder coding is proposed" (Expand search), "coder modern coding risks proposed" (Expand search), "coder color coding risks proposed" (Expand search), "coder odor coding risks proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder doping risks proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder flooding risks proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder working risks proposed" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding risks proposed" (Expand search), "code code coding risks proposed" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding risks proposed" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding risks proposed\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding risks proposed ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding risks proposed") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.