Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding risks based" » "coder modern coding risks based" (Expand search), "coder color coding risks based" (Expand search), "coder odor coding risks based" (Expand search), "coder coder doping risks based" (Expand search), "coder coder flooding risks based" (Expand search), "coder coder working risks based" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding risks based" (Expand search), "code code coding risks based" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding risks based" (Expand search), "coder coder coding risk based" (Expand search), "coder coder coding risks caused" (Expand search), "coder coder coding risks posed" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding risks based") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding risks based\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding risks based ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding risks based") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.