Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding relation sequence" » "coder coder coding resolution sequence" (Expand search), "coder coder coding isolation sequence" (Expand search), "coder coder coding region sequence" (Expand search), "coder coder loving relation sequence" (Expand search), "coder coder reading relation sequence" (Expand search), "coder coder loving relations sequence" (Expand search), "coder modern coding relation sequence" (Expand search), "coder color coding relation sequence" (Expand search), "coder odor coding relation sequence" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding relation sequence" (Expand search), "code code coding relation sequence" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding relation sequence" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding relation sequence") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding relation sequence\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding relation sequence ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding relation sequence") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.