Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding planning effect" » "coder coder coping planning effect" (Expand search), "coder coder loading planning effect" (Expand search), "coder coder zoning planning effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding blanching effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding learning effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding training effect" (Expand search), "coder modern coding planning effect" (Expand search), "coder color coding planning effect" (Expand search), "coder odor coding planning effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding planning effect" (Expand search), "code code coding planning effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding planning effect" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding planning effect\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding planning effect ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding planning effect") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.