Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding penalized regression" » "coder coder coding censored regression" (Expand search), "coder coder coding enabled regression" (Expand search), "coder coder on penalized regression" (Expand search), "coder modern coding penalized regression" (Expand search), "coder color coding penalized regression" (Expand search), "coder odor coding penalized regression" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding penalized regression" (Expand search), "code code coding penalized regression" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding penalized regression" (Expand search)
"in python pythin python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding penalized regression") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding penalized regression\") OR (\"in python pythin python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding penalized regression ) OR ( in python pythin python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding penalized regression") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))*.