Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding peer instruction" » "coder modern coding peer instruction" (Expand search), "coder color coding peer instruction" (Expand search), "coder odor coding peer instruction" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding peer instruction" (Expand search), "code code coding peer instruction" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding peer instruction" (Expand search), "coder coder coding over instruction" (Expand search), "coder coder coding speech instruction" (Expand search), "coder coder coding genes instruction" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding peer instruction") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding peer instruction\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding peer instruction ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding peer instruction") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.